This Historical and Royal Commission into SAPOL determining Autobiography. UGLY HEROS - The Price Of Unlawful Enforcement.
Below - Author Cover Design followed by the banned (2021) Self Publication Final Cover Proof.
SUMMARY EXTRACT 'The Road To Resolution' "This use of informant’s is highly illegal (no brainer point), especially illegal against innocent and uninvolved persons - the use of criminals to harass people reporting police crimes – police paedophilia, was something that after a decade of witnessing mistakes and false claims Really pissed me off. Researching everything I witnessed and following all relevant publicised media. Myself being labelled by the government and SAPOL as a police officer for half a decade then suddenly being painted up as a criminal by police, is enough to piss anyone off. I wanted to absolutely squash this cover up practise of plausible deniability and constructive ambiguity – conflate and confuse as a practise. Living nearly my entire thirties recklessly endangered while police manipulated my life. I also wanted the practice of felons negotiating leniency where there is a victim(s) of serious crime eliminated. Having made recommendations on informant procedures which were broadly public by 2020, I got my opportunity to prove the current practice not fit for purpose in 2023 and I did – in Australia expanding to the USA. Forced to defend myself again against the stalking of Dave Kyriacou (SAPOL ID 40657) who used immigrants and ex police officers to stalk me over a period of July - September of 2023 conclusively. Dave Kyriacou (SAPOL ID 40657) with an extensive list of felons on his human resource list. Felons with a history of threatening my life, domestic violence and/or of serious organised crime involvement. The practice of using informants in such an ad hoc, unaccountable, criminal manner not only irrefutably unreliable for police but unredeemable for some human resources. Undeniably.
I researched my experiences extensively, discussing the use of informants by police forces with police and informants alike. Damian H Ferrari (Born 1966, Beaufort, Victoria AUS - VICPOL) stating that they don't use informants, a lie. Yet, him stating that the percentage of investigations compromised with the use of informants is almost one hundred percent, is one hundred percent correct. The fact that police KNOW this yet engage the practice on such a substantial scale level is recklessly endangering our society. Witnessing an affray of criminality to cover up sex crimes over a ten-year period from 2013 – 2023, to me this practice was conclusively out of date, not fit for purpose, criminal, and an engagement of terrorism against Australians at times. Facts which after I heard it had me ponder for years, how the fuck this practice was still going on an ongoing basis. I focused on false, unsubstantiated evidence provided to police. Covert Recordings. Covert recording is recording when one or more people being recorded are unaware that recording is taking place. Evidence of the use of breaches to the privacy and security act in order to cover up governance crime. Evidence of perjury that the courts, police and the public (felons) had copies of. There being various reasons why someone might want to record audio or visual content, including to gather incriminating evidence against another person. Informants trying to exchange false intel to avoid the consequences of serious crimes – criminals hoping for a free ride after committing crimes. I began to record my interactions with the police, some recordings declared, some just literally necessary to stop the cover up. I had previously enjoyed bringing the reality to informants hoping to get away with serious crimes by misconstruing ad hoc evidence that it is normally against the law to record a phone call without the other person’s consent. I admittedly enjoyed telling wannabe human resources that the only thing they were achieving was a defence avenue in court for the person they were setting up in hopes of getting away with murder - me. In fact, ‘covertly’ (secretly) using a listening device such as a mobile phone or digital recorder and publishing or otherwise distributing that material can amount to a criminal offence - public disclosure exempt. Something I witnessed firsthand was persons trying to audio record conversations in desperation to cover up their involvement in the sex industry and drug trafficking. Remember it is an offence of wilfully telling an untruth or making a misrepresentation under oath and defamation to misrepresent someone out of context. Make sure if you’re repeating something, that it is first and foremost true, necessary to repeat and in context. Numerous illegal recordings were taken during the Gordon Tearonui Hamm investigation by felons desperate for concessions and immunity in their crimes."
Comments